The (Mostly) Compleat Foreverywhere (plus Steve Burns Interview!)

Foreverywhere album cover

We're big fans of StevenSteven's Foreverywhere around these parts, so because lead Steven Steve Burns recently answered a handful of questions about the album, I thought it'd be worth the time to put together the set of videos Burns and co-Steven Steven Drozd put together for the album alongside Burns' responses.

It's just such a fun album, y'all, including the 3-song arc across the entire album telling the story of a princess and a very persistent unicorn.  You can read my review of the album (linked above) for some background on the long and winding road the duo's taken to get to this point, but at this point, enjoy the interview and the music and visuals.


Zooglobble: What was the final push or change that let this long-germinating album out into the world?

Steve Burns: We finally just said "let's do it ourselves".  It seemed like such a shame to let it fester indefinitely in the ether...and I figured it made sense with the 20th anniversary of Blue's Clues

StevenSteven - "A Fact Is a Gift That You Give Your Brain [YouTube[Note: I love this song and video so much.]

Steve Burns in concert

What was your motivation behind writing the three Unicorn / Princess Rainbow songs?  Did you want to tell that story and find you just couldn’t fit it into one song?  Did you want to write some songs that could fit over the arc of an album?

I really want to do something that told a story, sort of like Puff the Magic Dragon or Ziggy Stardust or Harry Nillson's "The Point". I've always loved narrative music- it's something The Flaming Lips do so well for example. We also want to take deliberately established kids entertainment "cliches" like rainbow and unicorns and sort of give them an unexpected rock and roll upgrage...if that makes sense.  Also for the record, we've been doing the whole unicorn thing since about 2008, Starbucks.

StevenSteven - "The Unicorn and Princess Rainbow" [YouTube]

The album features some very “serious” songs and some very silly ones -- how did you think about how to fit them together on the album, and whether or not they’d fit together at all?

I think if there's a thread that runs through the songs, it's about never giving up. From The Lonely Unicorn, to the song about bullying, to the one about the toilet bowl, there's a strong theme of determination and courage on the album. At least I hope there is!!!

StevenSteven - "OK Toilet Bowl" [YouTube]

Photo credit: Jeremy Slutskin

Interview: Andrew & Polly (Andrew Barkan & Polly Hall)

Andrew and Polly standing

Andrew Barkan and Polly Hall -- AKA Andrew & Polly -- first attracted attention in the kids audio world for their music, adept at  crafting tiny, quirky little pop jewels for the preschool set.  But in 2015 they started releasing a podcast, Ear Snacks, which showed another side of the duo -- as inquisitive explorers of the world around them, near and far, bringing kids and experts together to discuss important topics like fruit and shadows.  With original music from the duo and intricately-layered sound production, it's a high quality magazine for the ears, but kind of a weird one.  (That's high praise, by the way.)

In the fall of 2016 they released Ear Snacks: Songs from the Podcast, a collection of the music that appeared on the show.  I talked to them last year about the show, and it was a wide-ranging conversation about how they put together the show, how they value their time (especially in relationship to what is a totally free, and totally commercial-free, endeavor), and what might be next in their audio world.


Zooglobble: What was the genesis for Ear Snacks -- what was the point at which you said, “Hey, I’ve got an idea!”?  How did it come about?

Polly Hall (P): That is such a big question.  We both wanted to do something that wan’t an album that was a longer-form project, and we brainstormed a lot of different concepts for what it could be.  We work with children’s television, so thinking about doing something bigger is totally within reach of what we might want to do.  But to know exactly what we wanted to do and could do was really hard to figure out.

Andrew Barkan (A): Yeah, we knew we wanted to do something beyond the songs that captured the way we’d learned to interact with our audiences through playing with them for five years out here in Los Angeles.  When we did our first album before we left New England we hadn’t played very many shows at all.  And then we came out to L.A. and tried to play those songs and found... these kids like them, but when you’re in a room with 50 kids, you have to know how to hold their attention spans, how to engage them with the subject matter and since we generally don’t put on a big rock stage-y, concert-y type show with gimmicks and things, we want the actual content of what we are saying and how we are listening and asking our fans to participate in the concert to be the meat of the concert.  

P: Until recently we hadn’t really done large stage concerts.  Now we do more of them.  But in doing hundreds of performances...

A: Maybe 50 a year for awhile...

P: ... either with their parents or in schools...

A: A lot of carpet...

P: ... we learned how to reach them on the right developmental level.  One of the best pieces of feedback we got from parents and educators -- aside from saying, we like the music -- was saying we really got the kids.  So we knew we wanted to do something where we could demonstrate really getting kids.

A: Yeah, understanding their developmental level and allowing them to participate in the concert.  So we thought a podcast where parents interviewed their kids would be a great way for us to engage with our fans and for us to be able to interact with things they say.  Kids feel real special when someone’s asking them a question, let alone asking them a question with a microphone.

Is that why perhaps you didn’t do a video series, that the podcast allowed for interactivity?

P: Yeah, the interactivity was key for us.  We had somebody suggest to us a few years ago, because we’ve done a few off-the-cuff couch YouTube videos that kids really like, that we need[ed] to do that every week.  But we saw people doing that on YouTube and we thought, when we talk with kids, they don’t have to see us to really love the experience and since we’re comfortable with music and comfortable with recording technology, we also had to think practically -- what’s something that we could do ourselves?

A: We know how to create a lot more magic with audio than we know how to with video.

P: We thought about different things we could do -- we thought about doing fiction, a narrative thing, but it felt like too much to do.  We didn’t know if we could write convincing material, do music, and act or hire and direct a cast.  But what we knew we could do was work with kids.

A: Right -- ask them questions, see what they think about stuff.

P: And we know how it goes when we’re in a room with fifty of ‘em, and we figured we could take a little bit of that full-of-life experience and get to people we aren’t able to see directly on a weekly or monthly basis.

A: But we’ve gotten to interact with fans in New Zealand or Brazil or Missouri through this where we’ve never been to those places.   So that’s pretty cool.

How did you map out the episodes?  Did you say, we want to do an episode on, say, “strings”?  But how did you come up with the ideas for each episode, which are based on a theme on a particular topic?

A: We had a whole list -- a Google doc, or a spreadsheet -- 

P: There’s probably a hundred topics we didn’t use.

A: We picked the first four that we were going to block out, and delayed them because we wanted to find experts.  “Fruits” and “Hats” were definitely in the first four.

P: I can’t remember how we got to hats.  

A: It was Izzy’s first word.

P: Yeah! Well, it wasn’t his first word -- he said “dada” and stuff like that -- but it was the first one he picked.  He found that word.  And then everywhere we looked, all we could see was hats...  I think those first few came to us fairly easily.  What was it?... Fruit, hats, balls...  Those were more obvious.  I think at the beginning, we were more like, let’s pick something, like, universally kid-loved...

A: ... without being lollipops, dinosaurs...

P: ... right, but let’s pick things kids want to talk about, because we didn’t know who we were going to get to talk to.  The first episode is kids of people we knew, and now we have kids who write in from all over who want to be on.  Those first three, we thought about our preschool audience, we thought about things that were simple and we let them take us somewhere else.  But then it got little bit more complex.  We probably thought them in batches, so...

A: The next set was disguises, critters, boxes.

P: We came up with those three together.  And then the next ones we had a brainstorming session and came up with the rest of them together.  We kind of sweated them out, too.  We couldn’t decide, and we were really specific about what made it.  Like the very last episode of season [was] “Moves” and to get into the conversation of what is an Ear Snacks episode and what isn’t in a way that doesn’t make any sense that is kind of intuitive but also has a rigid sense of qualifications, “moves” was chosen over “steps,” tracks,” uh, I can’t remember...

A: “Tickets”

P: Yeah, tickets.  But we did try to think once we did the first six, what balances out these other things.  Where can we go to complement what we’ve already done

A: Because they kind of fall into different categories of things -- they’re all tangible objects, except for “Pairs,” maybe, or “Disguises,” which is how you’d use an object, or “Shadows,” which is not tangible.  But they’re things kids know about, and we try to think of things we can approach from many different angles that we can get kids thinking about creatively -- the meanings of certain words.  For something as simple as “Balls,” like what is the biggest ball in the universe?  What is the smallest ball?  What balls can you see in your room, and everyone picks the regular sports ball first, and then you start realizing, it’s this shape -- why do we have this shape?  What are the forces that make this shape a thing in our world?

P: So on the one hand it has to be a topic that has a lot of depth but on the other hand if we thought about anything for as long as we thought about these episodes, we could probably find something to talk about.

Did you choose topics knowing you had a really good song and wanted to turn it into an episode, or did you choose topics, and then write the songs, or was it a little bit of both?

A:  Both, absolutely both.  “Grapes,” for example, we had written -- we had the hook for awhile -- and we had decided to make “fruit” the first episode because we knew we had this great song we thought would make a great kickoff for the podcast.

P:  We almost didn’t put it in, though...

Nooooooo!  Nooooo!!!!

P:  ... because at some point... was it going to be a single?  Was it going to be in the podcast?  But at some point we realized this was some sort of fruit anthem, it can’t not be in there.  Some of it is chicken-and-egg, some of it is one or the other.

A:  But the reverse is... sometimes over the course of an episode, we have this thing that the kids have access to and it relates to something larger and we don’t know what the larger relationship idea is... like “Rain.”

P:  Yeah, “Rain” was written pretty much after the whole episode was finished.  We were sitting around talking about how all the different parts of the episode connected together and what that meant and we wrote that song sitting on the floor of the studio talking about that stuff.  That song would never have been written if we hadn’t of...

A:  ... If we hadn’t talked to your friend who was a hydrologist who came up with the idea of, we can predict climate, we can see it over millions of years -- we can see glaciers and we know they’re going to recede and disappear because of the way climate is changing -- yet we can’t say, because weathermen are always wrong and so is the weather app, what the weather’s going to be like this afternoon.

P:  And that’s an experience children feel all the time.  They don’t know what’s coming up next and they don’t know how to handle that and when we started to think about that, all that stuff just started to come out, whereas some of the other songs, like “Critters,” for example... We had a cover of a Bill Staines song, “Critters,” on our previous record which inspired the episode about animals, but didn’t actually appear in the episode because we didn’t want to go to the trouble of seeking out copyright, the intellectual property rights.

A:  All of these podcasts, it’s original, it’s ours.

P:  But in that way, the idea of “critters,” of talking about them, of all the different parts of “critters” in the country and world, we probably wouldn’t have done that if we hadn’t have chosen that song.

Ear Snacks Songs from the Podcast cover

I’m assuming that when you are writing a song for kids’ TV, they are probably giving a set of parameters -- we need a song that is so long and is about [x] and here are the emotional beats we need to hit.  Did that make it easier for the cases where you had a podcast episode but no song, and you knew you needed to write something, or was that irrelevant?

A:  Absolutely.  I don’t even think of myself as an artist that much.  Polly was a folk [musician] -- she’s done a lot of folk-rock stuff and written a lot of originals not for kids, but I haven’t.  I come from the world of film music, where I was never good at composing any kind of music at all until I realized it was for something.  And once I was presented with the challenge of here is a scene, or here is a film, what kind of music would enhance this film, how would you write something that follows the dramatic beats and captures the spirit of it, then I was suddenly unlocked -- “Oh, this would be great for this kind of orchestra,” or “This kind of music would be really great for that” -- and I’d figure it out.  I’d map out the beats and my brain starts exploding with ideas.

And the same goes for kids music.  We’ve written a bunch of songs outside the context of this podcast, but when we have a particular topic and a particular set of feedback from kids... [Take, for example,] the “Mail” song.  I’d had this idea for awhile -- I’m notorious for not opening my mail.

P:  Yeah, we had something really great arrive in the mail years ago... and the chorus for that [song] came about years ago because of this happenstance amazing thing that happened.  And we were sitting around the living room and we realized, “Don’t forget to open your mail.”

A:  You really shouldn’t.  And then we realized that mail is a type of time travel.  Every piece of mail you ever open in your entire life has been by someone in the past.

P:  Because we write songs for work and are given assignments, we have to find different ways to tap into our creativity, because we might have to write the song of your life on a Wednesday morning at 7:30 AM when you had a weird day the day before and tomorrow’s gonna be weird, too.  And so sometimes you have a flash of inspiration that results in a song that could come about from nowhere specific -- it just comes to you -- but most of the time you just have to pull it out of yourself at any time.  So this is a good format for us for writing, but is not necessarily how it goes about.  We had talked about doing a “shadows” episode, and then our “Tiny Dinos” song was partly inspired by that, but it partly inspired by me walking into the kitchen and we had this tiny dinosaur on the floor and it had this big, big shadow because of the way the sun was hitting it.  So would we have written that song anyway?  Could we have written without giving ourself the assignment?  I don’t know... We might not have, and that’s one thing the podcast has been really good for.

A:  We don’t really root ourselves in genre, so having specific content or topic helps us pick which genre to write a song in.

P:  And I think without the podcast and without the self-imposed deadline of a podcast, I’m not sure we would have written...

A:  We wrote, like, 25 songs last year.

P:  Yeah.  That many songs, and whatever many songs ended up on the record -- fourteen? -- I don’t think we would have written and produced that many original songs -- not one of them is a cover -- without having the podcast driving us toward that.  Because in kids music you do a lot of covers.  It doesn’t matter -- even if you’re doing originals, I think people are probably doing covers on stage just to round out their sets.  It gets hard to come up with that many original songs that you could put out and do in concert.

Beyond covers, you’ve got public domain songs for kids, too, of course.  Billy Kelly once said that he puts covers on his albums because they help with parents and helps make his songs fit in by comparison -- it puts them on a different pedestal than they might otherwise be.

P:  Also, they’re just fun to do.  We love to do covers.

A:  I don’t know if it’s a pedestal, but I hope parents who seek out this album realize that these songs really didn't come from covers, they came from us doing this really interesting project for a year with different kids and families from all around the world.  So I’m people can appreciate that.

About how long does it take you to put together a single podcast -- that gets at the issue of people valuing that something came from somebody -- and how do you value your time?  I mean, sometimes people are musicians and do something that has nothing to do with their recording career as their full-time or part-time gig -- they’re a librarian or whatever -- and you are different.  You’re “Andrew & Polly” but you have this other career as film and TV composers and songwriters.  And you probably get much better for the TV and film side than you do for this.  How do you value your time so that you know, I need to spend so much time in this area given that you may be doing things for personal reasons or because you need to pay the utility bill... 

P:  Well, we thought about this -- how long does it take for us to make an episode?  So we tried to break it down.

A:  Just last night we tried to calculate it...

P:  ... because we were curious ourselves and we thought we might talk about it with you.  I think that a conservative estimate of how many hours go into producing one 20-minute episode of “Ear Snacks” without a song probably is about 45 hours.

Wow...

P:  So let’s talk about that.  We don’t have to go entirely in-depth, but the way it starts is that we design a series of questions for parents to ask their children, the kids who have volunteered to be on an episode after we’ve picked a topic.  Usually that’s one of us brainstorm[ing] every possible question we could ask about something, then the other one picks through it, and we have a major conversation of what is this going to be about, actually.  That series of questions and that interview experience with a parent is designed to be, even without participating in an episode of “Ear Snacks” is meant to be its own thing.  So it’s a 20-minute or so experience for a parent and child or a group of children...

A:  Could be 8 minutes, could be 45 minutes...

P:  ... depending on their age level.  And they might do it several times, but start to finish it’s intended to be an experience for them and they go through these series of questions and probably realize things along the way.  The questions lead to each in a way that may demonstrate something bigger without saying it.  There’s no statement -- they’re all meant to be child-driven questions.  And then parents record that on their own and send it back to us [usually on their smartphone].

Andrew Barkan and Polly Hall with instruments

That’s how it starts, and then we get into receiving those audio files, converting those audio files, editing those audio files, listening to them.  Listening to them takes forever -- when we did “pairs,” we had so many submissions...

A:  ... We had like 30 hours of audio to listen to...

P:  There’s the listening, the editing, the figuring out how they fit together, and what kind of music goes behind it.  Usually that’s the very first step, putting all the kid stuff together.  And sometimes along the way is where we figure out the expert.  It’s when we start trying to see if we can get an expert on whatever it is we’re trying to talk about.  Sometimes that’s a combination of who we know and doable and sometimes it’s “in our wildest dreams” who we might know.  Like for “letters” we thought, wouldn’t it be cool if we could somebody on one of the [Presidential] campaigns to talk about letters from kids.

A:  For “boxes” we wanted to talk to Antionette Portis, author of Not a Box, to talk

P:  Sometimes it happens and sometimes it doesn’t.  And sometimes we’re happy with what happens.  Like for “shadows” we wanted to talk to somebody about “Mars dials” and we found out that Bill Nye did a TED talk about Mars dials, and it turned out that through Kids Listen  Kitty Felde of Book Club for Kids knew somebody at the Planetary Society who did this great interview with us about shadows in space.

So then we get through all that, and there’s audio cleanup and mastering.  A lot of the music that goes behind the interviews whether they’re kids or adults is original score.  So I would say that 45 hours is a conservative estimate for the episode.

Now the song, that’s really hard.  I think probably the easiest song to produce that was in an episode, a fully-produced song that ended up on the record, was probably 20 hours-ish, but the harder ones, I couldn’t even put a thumb on it -- I don’t even know about “Dancing Pants.”

A:  Right, because “Dancing Pants” we’re writing a song, we’re blocking it out and getting all the different samples in, we’re scoring all the different charts for all the different players -- the saxophone player, the trumpet player, the euphonium player -- we’ve got to track them.

P:  It takes forever to get them in here, to get something unique sounding, to get Mista Cookie Jar over...  Sometimes the writing is the long part, like with maybe “Rain” -- it’s something we wrote for the studio, but then we just obsessed over every line in that song to make sure it was perfect.  But it was just a guitar [and] vocal [part], recorded on one mic that we built the rest of the song around.  And then we brought the trumpet player in and Andrew did his backup vocals, but that’s maybe one or two takes edited together of me just playing, sitting on the floor once we got every line just exactly how we wanted it.

So, yeah, 45 hours for an episode and another 20 for a song.

A:  And so how do we value our time, Polly?  [laughs]

P:  For “Ear Snacks,” the whole thing has been a total experiment -- the process, the episodes, everything.

A:  I would say a grand experiment.

P:  But that has included not valuing the time.  This is something we wanted to do.  We wanted to do it whether we got paid or not.  And we felt like we had to, we felt like we could.  And so we decided to do it without getting paid.

A:  We wanted to make the best thing we could possibly make.  

P:  And we wanted to know that we didn’t owe anybody anything in figuring out what that best thing could be.  So for this whole year and for this whole first season, it’s totally been just a labor of love.  We talked about how to monetize it at the very beginning of the project, knowing that we would need to at some point.  We have not figured out how to yet.  But we’ll have to if we want to keep doing this, because we value our other time very, very highly, which has allowed us to take on this experiment for free.  But the more hours we spend producing this -- with “Strings” we decided to do 5 episodes in 6 weeks...

A:  They were all going to be 8 minutes and they ended up being 18 minutes....

P:  The more time we put into it, the more time we spend away from our regular jobs, the less we can afford to put as much time into as we're doing.  So it's a balance and ultimately I'd like to see it sustainable.

A:  And we think we're creating a valuable thing, so we believe at some point it will be valued by somebody.  But we know it is valued by the families that do hear it, because we get amazing feedback and we get all these kids who want to participate.  It's the best thing.  I think the parents realize that, "Oh, this is a special time when I get to sit with my kid and ask them questions about this thing that they've never been specifically asked about before, and they get to see that I am listening to them, and I am respecting their intelligence" and it's amazing what they offer.  And sometimes they can't answer a question or they don't feel like it or they'd rather have a snack, but a lot of the time they have amazing things to say about these universal topics.

P:  Parents who participate -- one of them just told me... she interviewed her daughter for the first episode of "Ear Snacks," it was produced the March before, so her daughter was 4 when she recorded her, and they have this 20-30 interview that they did themselves, and they have how she fit into the show, and now she's 6.

A:  It's like a time capsule for people.

P:  And whether their kids are on one episode or in many episodes, it's a cool experience for them at home, and then it's cool for the kids to see how they fit into the bigger world with other children and other answers... and other adults -- it's cool for them to see what things they see the same and what things they see different.  And it's cool for them to do it at different times in their lives.  Our niece was in the first episode, and we knew she could only say... "bluuuueberry."  And now she can say,...

A:  "I like peas."  Now she's a motormouth.

P:  She's 3 1/2 and she's talking about all kinds of stuff.

Andrew Barkan and Polly Hall

But in terms of valuing it, I think we probably value it so much, that's why we haven't put a price on it.

A:  Yup.

P:  Not that we've had anything concrete [offer-wise], but when we've talked about a budget that might be worth to do, our numbers in our minds -- and maybe it's because we come from advertising and television, and we've drastically underpaid in all that stuff, too -- but what we think what an episode, or season, or year of "Ear Snacks" is worth is maybe more than other people might, so it has such a high price tag so that if we were going to put a price on it, it would have to be a... pretty big price.  Especially to involve somebody else in a way -- not that it would compromise the content, but that's the best thing we've had this year...

If you're gonna get paid, get paid.

P:  That's exactly right.  Otherwise, we can produce one episode a year...

A:  That's right -- if you've noticed, we don't exactly release something every Wednesday or anything like that.

P:  We can do whatever we want in the way we think is the best, and not get paid at all, or we can have a conversation about doing the other thing.  But so far we've been really happy about what we've been doing. 

A:  The flip side of that is we have to do everything ourselves -- we edit everything, we manage all the parents who send stuff in, and we don't have a producer so we don't have a third voice to bounce ideas off of and get clarity about what to include in an episode or what things are funny or not funny...

P:  ... or we can only reach the guest experts that we can reach or we know.

What's next for you?

P:  We've had an idea for a narrative thing for a long time that we might like to do.  It's a series of songs that are all tied to together in some kind of story.  And I don't know if that's going to end up being dramatized or if it'll end up being a series of songs that we're going to be singing -- I don't know what it is.  But it's a funny story about a dog and a cricket, and we pretty quickly wrote what we thought was their theme song, and the more we talk about the different adventures they could have, the more we come up with ideas for songs.  It's not going to be easy to do, and it's not going to be quick to do.  It's harder than the writing assignments we've given ourselves in the past and we're totally unsure of it, but we're really excited about it.

Photo credits: Josh Piha

Interview: Cory Cullinan (Doctor Noize)

Cory Cullinan

Cory Cullinan is a busy man, a fast talker, a guy with boundless enthusiasm.  And for much of the past decade, he's channeled that energy into being Doctor Noize, recording and performing music (often though not always with a classical bent) for kids.  His most recent project is his most audacious -- Phineas McBoof Crashes the Symphony is a two-act (or two-CD, if that's still how your family listens to music) work of musical theatre for kids that runs the gamut of musical styles.  It's definitely one of the most ambitious works for kids from the past several years.

Cory chatted with me about his musical background, the process of creating this latest album, and his favorite memories from the experience.  As I noted, he's got a lot of energy, and is passionate about this project, so there's a lot to dig into here...


Zooglobble: Let me start by asking, when did you first start getting into classical music?  Did the ghost of Beethoven appear somewhere?

Cory Cullinan: When I was 17.  It was a combination of things, pretty serious.  I had very interesting high school years where my brother was a computer programmer -- Steve Jobs used to come over and hang out at my house with my brother, so I had an interesting intellectual background.  My brother got a brain tumor and ended up dying two years later.  And my father who was also very well known in the Bay Area and very depressed about this and killed himself less than a year after that.  So when I was in high school I had opportunity -- undesirable opportunity, you might say -- to look at life differently from most 15, 16, 17-year-olds.  I was really inspired by my brother.  He wasn’t into music, he was making games, programming for corporations.  He was doing what he loved at a very young age and a very high level.  And I decided I wanted to do that.  I’d always loved music and soccer.  I’d played in a bunch of rock bands, I’d written rock songs.  By the time I was 17 or 18, I still loved rock songs, and I still do, but I felt it a little bit constricting and boring since it was always the same structure and always the same instruments.  So I started reaching out to other forms of music, and I looked at jazz and looked at classical music. And I decided orchestral music and classical music was awesome.  It was amazingly colorful and vibrant and literally limitless.

So by the time I was 18 and got to Stanford, I was a classical music major.  I’d gone from being a soccer kid 3 years earlier to being a classical music major.  I still played soccer at Stanford for a little while, but retired soon after.

Doctor Noize and friends

So that’s a long way of saying I had a series of inspirations and events that made me think, I want to reach for something really, really interesting and challenging.  Because when [my brother] was dying, it made him happy because he was doing something significant and challenging and wonderfully rich intellectually.  And I thought, I want to do that.  When I became Doctor Noize, it’s ironic, my first hit song was “Banana,” which is not exactly the most intellectually rigorous song that’s ever been created in this world.  But I knew I wanted to be more challenging for kids than the genre would typically demand of me.  And that has been both positive and negative for my career in terms of exposure and success level I’ve had as Doctor Noize.  But I learned from my brother, I don’t care.  I’m going to do what I’m going to do, and hopefully people will like it enough to support me, and if they don’t, I’ll do something else.  That’s sort of been my philosophy in everything, from building this crazy studio in my basement to Doctor Noize, I’m going to do what is most interesting and what I can contribute most to the world and hopefully there will be enough people to support it and if there aren’t I’ll do something else.

And I know you understand about classical music... don’t you play cello?

Violin -- I’m not in a symphony currently, but I still pull out my violin every couple weeks or so.

So I know that you get it.  An orchestra is like a sports team, too, like a football team.  There are 65 people in an orchestra, and they’re all trying to do something bigger than themselves.  That’s a really beautiful thing about orchestral music.  The same thing’s true with a 4-piece rock band, but it’s much more so with a giant orchestra of a bunch of players who are playing very sophisticated, contrapuntal music and trying to make it come together to make something really beautiful.

Were you always more interested in orchestral music than ensembles or solo work [in classical music]?

I love them both -- I love the Haydn string quartets and there’s other things I love, but I really like the Romantic orchestral music and so does the modern world because almost every film score is a Romantic piece in new clothes.  I love the chamber music, too, but as I said before I’m fascinated with a large group of people coming together to do something bigger than themselves.  That’s just conceptually beautiful.  It’s also challenging to write for -- it’s much more challenging to write for an orchestra than for a string quartet.

When did you start writing the score for Phineas McBoof Crashes the Symphony?

I think it was back in 2010 or 2011.  What happened is that it started as a commission for a live work.  I got a commission from the McConnell Foundation in Northern California, the Chico/Redding area -- I got a $10,000 commission to write a live, orchestral work for kids.  And Kyle Pickett, who was the ultimate conductor of this CD, was the conductor of the North State Symphony at the time.  He and I were music majors at Stanford way back in the day, and we both sung in the Stanford Chamber Chorale together -- they are the adult choir on this album.

Phineas McBoof Crashes the Symphony cover

The task was to write a 45-to-60 minute show that got kids jazzed about orchestral music.  So what we did was we did the shows, we did a tour of Northern California -- we went to Chico, Redding, and some other cities on 3 consecutive days, and each time we got more than a thousand people there in big auditoriums, and the crowds went nuts.  So we were like, “Wow, this is awesome, we’re on to something here” and we decided then that we wanted to make a recording.  The first version of that is we did an orchestral version of “Banana” on a Doctor Noise album -- that was fun, we got Nathan Gunn.  And then it became this bigger ambition, which Kyle and I had talked about from the beginning, which was to do an album of it, a two-act musical.  But the shows will still be the 45-to-60 minute version we originally did on the tour.

It was funny -- one of my favorite pop/rock guys is Elvis Costello, and just by chance every night on that tour, we played the day after the nights Elvis Costello played in the same theatre.  So his buses would go out the same night we would come in, and that made us feel good.  I never met, though, the bus was always literally pulling out as we were pulling in.

When you’re writing an original orchestral work for kids, how hard is it not to hear Peter and the Wolf constantly?

Oh, it’s easy, I don’t care about Peter and the Wolf.  I mean, I like Peter and the Wolf, but although we marketed it as a modern kid’s Peter and the Wolf, or a modern version of Young Person’s Guide to the Orchestra, I’ve always looked at every Doctor Noise album as an audio Pixar movie for kids.  I really wanted to write a musical that introduced kids to the orchestra and knew from very early on that we didn’t want to do a 15- or -20-minute thing like Peter and the Wolf.  There is a Peter and the Wolf-ish section in the second act when all the instruments are introduced in a dramatic narrative sort of way, but didn’t really think about Peter and the Wolf at all, to be honest.

That’s interesting because if you were to ask someone, is there a classical music piece for kids, they might say Peter and the Wolf  and if they had more than 5 [classical] CDs in their collection they might say, there’s that other, by that English guy, but beyond Peter and the Wolf and Young Person’s Guide to the Orchestra, there’s really not much there.  But what struck me was -- you used the phrase “musical theatre,” and deliberately, because there are songs in there that are clearly not in the classical tradition, they’re much poppier, or musical theatre-y.  So that was one of your goals from the beginning, to be not just classical, but more inclusive, genre-wise?

Totally.  If you look at the Doctor Noize characters, one the ways I set it up so it’d be fun, was that characters have totally different voices -- we have opera voices, we have bad country voices, we have pop voices, so the idea is that every time one of these characters steps forward and sings, they’re learning about this other style of music, but they’re still bringing their own thing to it.  It’s not like we’re going to have the Lenny, Phineas, and Sydney the Beak all of a sudden singing opera.  That wasn’t the goal from the beginning -- it was, wouldn’t it be interesting if these three tenors characters and Lenny and Sydney the Beak, who’s a rapper, they all educated each other about their styles of music and they all learned to love all those styles.  That was always the premise behind the storylines of all the Doctor Noize albums.

When you were coming up with the storyline, did you start with the premise that you wanted to tell a story and then weave some basic classical music knowledge in there --?

Yes.

So that was the way you worked rather than setting up a structure of “this is how the orchestra operates and I’m going to wrap a story around that.

Totally.  I learned from 3 places -- being a parent, being a high school music teacher, and watching Pixar movies -- that the way to get anybody engaged in anything is to tell a story with characters.  So that is always the first thing.  When I was a high school music teacher, I had this music history class.  It’s possibly the thing I’m most proud of in life because it made me realize I could do this in other arenas.  I had this classical music history class elective in high school and it became so popular it was made a required freshman course.  The way that happened was I learned that if you played Beethoven’s Fifth for people and talked about this amazing 4-note motif, they’re going to get bored out of their minds.  But if you tell a story around it, and you talk about Beethoven and how he went deaf, and why they wrote their stuff, you can get anybody, even a 9-year-old, you want to hear it and they’ll say, “Yes!”  All of that is about building drama into music, which is very easy when you’re talking about classical music because all these musicians are freaks.  There are crazy stories about all of them.

One of my favorite moments as Doctor Noize was when we made a trumpet player cry.  In the North State Symphony, in the show, we had this bad guy, Mama, who hated classical music and was trying to get us to stop the show.  We get to this part of the show where we say, “But then we’d have to play Beethoven’s Fifth.  Do you want to hear Beethoven’s Fifth?,” and a thousand kids scream, “Yeaaaaahhhh!”  And the trumpet player started crying.  I realized we don’t have to play to a bunch of blue-haired old ladies driving Lexuses.  We can introduce this music to kids if we share with them the excitement of the music instead of just getting up and playing the music for them.

The music is very easy to write once you have the story, because stories create emotional situation and drama and things that for a composer are just fun to write.  I’ve always found for me that once you have a structure, the music writes itself. 

You’ve written a lot of the music, so how do you go about getting the cast of characters -- not the characters of the musical, but all these artists -- how do you get their participation in the project?

Well, one of them was my wife, so that’s easy. [Laughs]  There’s a recording studio in the basement, so that’s easy.  Two of them are my children, so that’s easy.  Then it gets more complicated.  The whole Doctor Noize cast came back, so that was kind of easy.  Everybody knows that every year or two, we’re going to get together to make another recording.

The two big snags we had were Isabel Leonard and John McVeigh.  Isabel and Nathan were friends and had performed in many things together and Nathan [Gunn] had been on the Doctor Noize CDs since the first CD, so it’s nice to have a Grammy-winning opera singer on your first CD when no one’s ever heard of you.  That allows you to get people like Isabel Leonard interested, which was so amazing -- it’s unreal what she does.  When I called Isabel, I thought I would be selling her and pitching her on the recording, but after a minute, I realized she was in, that Nathan had already told her about it and said this would be really fun, and she was in.  So that was ridiculously easy.

There’s a track on the CD called “Mama’s Lament,” and it’s Isabel’s big introductory torch song, and that is all one take.  There’s no overdubs, and there’s no pitch-shifting.  And for a composer who’s used to working in a studio and working with all us pop singers who meticulously perfect every note, it was ridiculous to listen to her do that.  If you listen to that piece, it goes from musical theatre to pop to whatever, it’s all over the place, it’s hysterical, and she’s acting. And in one take.  So working with her was just amazing.  That was one moment I will never forget in my recording career, just watching her record that.  

John McVeigh is a guy who’s perform with the Metropolitan Opera, and done some musical theatre, and we got him through... I can’t remember, Kyle Pickett’s wife knew somebody who knew him, I don’t remember. But I just contacted him and he flew out here to Colorado and recorded his part.  He got the role of the shark coming out and being himself over time.  He got it for all sorts of musical and personal reasons and he was just hysterical to work with.  He was the last person we recorded and he made it way better.  

Other people, like Sidney the Beak -- the woman who plays Sidney the Beak is the only non-professional of the major cast members and she was my high school student when I was a high school teacher in the Bay Area.  She was a basketball star and one of the only kids who could rap at the school, and she recorded some rap songs for me and I hired her early on and she kept coming back.  Now she’s 30 years old and I think she’s [with] the global health initiative for the Clinton Foundation or something very impressive like that, but we still get her every 2 years to record for us.  It’s the only thing she does musically, as far as I know [laughs].

I was going to say it was impressive, certainly listening to Isabel Leonard, but listening to the whole album in terms of the number of styles, vocal performances -- it’s a very impressive collection.

I appreciate that, and we have people who are not super-famous who are amazing on this album, like Ben Evans plays both Bottomus and Lenny, who, if you’ve heard them, have totally different voices.  He was a guy I went to college with, and while everybody who [was there] knows Ben Evans, he’s not a household name.  He was amazing.

Cory Cullinan, Isabel Leonard, Nathan Gunn, and Kyle Pickett

The great thing about working with Isabel and Nathan is they’re both hysterical.  They’re both big-time opera stars.  This is the problem with marketing classical music -- everyone thinks they’re so serious, but they’re actually normal people with kids who have fun.

It was really a gift for me working with people of their stature and working with the Prague Philharmonic.  I felt extremely fortunate to have been able to write something and on the recording for that level.  It’s not something I took lightly.  It was a real gift to me.  Certainly I did my part in setting up that gift, but I got lucky in a lot of ways.  It was pretty neat that they wanted to do it.   And they wanted to do it because they “got it.”  Even my PR agent, Elizabeth Waldman Frazier, when I sent this project to her, she e-mailed back in ten minutes and said, “yeah, I want to do this.”

I don’t know how much you want to get into this philosophical discussion, but we live in a world where attention spans are constricting, constricting to the point where -- and I don’t even consider this a political comment -- one of our two major presidential candidates has, like, a 10-minute attention span.  That’s the world we live in now.  And you can see why -- it has to do with the internet, it has to do with all sorts of popular culture type things.  And I love pop culture.  I would just like us to also be able to apply our minds to things that are more sophisticated and have a longer duration.  There are problems like climate change that our kids are going to need to solve, and it’s not going to get solved by something where if you can’t figure it out in two minutes, we’re going to move on to something else.

So one of the neat things about this project was that everybody was on board from the beginning with the absolute insane crazy and counterintuitive-to-the-modern idea that we are going to make a 2-act operative work of musical theatre for kids.  Right there, that’s nuts.  And part of the appeal of the project is that it’s nuts, right?  It doesn’t really fit in the modern world anymore.  In a weird way that makes it fit because there’s nothing a whole lot like it.  What sort of impact we can make will depend on how many live shows we can book and how many folks like you we can get to talk about it.  But at least we’re giving it a shot.

And what we’ve found from the live shows, is that people love it.  I’ve never had a response like this to the CD I’ve recorded -- we have, like, 75 write-ups, and everybody likes it.  I don’t know if it’s good or people are thinking, “Oh, if I criticize a children’s orchestral album I’m going to sound dumb,” I don’t know.  It seems to me that people get that this is a worthwhile thing to do.  And I think it’s a worthwhile thing to do, it was worth the risk.  It’s my project, I’m certainly no victim, I’m lucky, but it was -- and still is -- quite a financial and career risk for me to do this.  I spent a lot of my time on this, and that time has not yielded money back yet.

Twenty years from now, what are you going to remember about the project and the process of making and performing this particular work?

A couple things.  One, I am going to remember doing this with and for my kids.  Kids, for example, are the ones who came up with the idea of Mama being a bunny.  My kids were directly involved in the story.  My kids were the ones who came up with the idea of her casting spells and instruments flying all around with the musicians attached to them in the concert hall.  So my kids were at the perfect age, they were between the age of 7 and 13 as this whole process went on.  My kids helped me record this, which I do so my kids would have something like this.  So that’s number one, a very selfish reason.  I got to do the album I would love to do for my kids, with my kids.

And number two is, partly because what Doctor Noize had done before, and partly because of the preposterous premise of the whole thing, and partly because of the connections I happen to have, I was able to get literally the exact cast -- the exact orchestra to the exact singing cast -- that I would love to have to do this work.  And rarely in life, whether you’re a creative musician, or an athlete, or anything, very rarely do you get to play on the team you dream of playing on.  I’m almost getting teary just talking about that, just working with this cast on this project... I hope I don’t, but I could die tomorrow and the main thing I wanted to do in life, I’ve gotten to do and very few people get to say that.  I consider it not only my obligation and my opportunity and my good fortune to get to talk about this and get shows and play the album, but I’ve already gotten to do the thing I really wanted to do in life which is a work of musical theatre with an orchestra for kids.  So I feel very lucky is what I’m trying to say.

And that feeling of being fortunate of getting what you want to do in life I know from my childhood is not always going to be the case. There are going to be times of challenge and sorrow in your life and when you get the opportunity to take a risk and do something you really want to do, you should do it.  Every single Doctor Noize album and book tells that story.  I feel fortunate to have been able to do that.