In many sports -- or at least those featuring a ball -- there's a gap between the initiation of action and the result. The ball leaves the attacker's foot, and it takes a second for the ball to reach the goal. The quarterback heaves the ball to the wide receiver streaking down the sideline, and 4 or 5 seconds later, we find out if it's caught, dropped, or intercepted. Or think of basketballs in their arc-ed path to the basketball. The crowd may be cheering wildly, but there is usually a bit of a pause, a collective intake of breath, as they wait for the result.
I'm thinking of this today as I continue to process the meaning of The Okee Dokee Brothers' win in the Best Children's Music Album category at the 2013 (55th) GRAMMY Awards Sunday. It was for their album Can You Canoe?, an album that inspired, and was inspired by, a trip the duo made by canoe halfway down the Mississippi River.
There's the announcement of the nominees, and then the pause while the presenter takes a moment to open the envelope. Unlike many of those sporting gaps, the result is set -- there's nothing that could have happened between the announcement of names and the uttering of "The Okee Dokee Brothers" that could have changed the fact that Joe and Justin would be walking onstage -- but there's the same intake of breath for a certain percentage of the audience.
At this point, dear reader, I'm sure you're wondering exactly what the Okee Dokee Brothers have to do with sports? Is their next album going to be sports-themed? (Answer: unless their trek along the Appalachian Trail is part of some timed event, then, no.)
The answer lies within the result.
In 2001, I had the good fortune to be an Arizona Diamondbacks fan. And I had the great fortune to be at the ballpark for Game Seven of the World Series against the New York Yankees. I know what the gap is.
I have a friend's home video from that game -- and that clip doesn't do the gap justice, nor does it fully capture the bedlam after the bloop just outside the infield and over the heads of the Yankees' drawn-in infield. But you get the idea -- a huge celebration. Didn't matter where you were -- I was sitting about as far from home plate as you can get in that park -- there was a full-throated roar and wailing. The walk back to the car in the parking garage was as good-natured a crowd as I have ever been in -- random high-fives with strangers, "Woo hoos!" everywhere, and slight disbelief that this 4-year-old team had somehow managed to beat baseball's most historically accomplished team, the New York Yankees. Not only had they beat the Yankees, they beat them in playoffs coming less than a couple months after the September 11th attacks made most of the rest of the country Yankees fans for a time.
Of course, it was a fairly even matchup, and with two of baseball's best pitchers at the time, Randy Johnson and Curt Schilling, pitching for the Diamondbacks, Arizona's eventual victory wasn't considered an upset. There was no reason to think that the Diamondbacks wouldn't be competing for the World Series trophy in 2002 as well.
A little more than a year ago, I wrote a post expressing some disbelief at the entire slate of the 54th Grammy Award nominees for Best Children's Album. When this year's slate of nominees was announced in December 2012, I outlined why I thought it was a better slate, completely setting aside whether I liked the slate as a whole better than last year's. But I also made the erroneous assumption that the nomination process was unchanged from the year before, when participation in Grammy365, the Recording Academy's social networking site for members, appeared from the outside to be a major determinant of who was nominated.
I heard shortly after that piece that no, in fact, the nominating process for kids' music had changed for the 55th Grammys. Nobody seemed to want to discuss it very much, and I can't say that I blame them -- a select group of Academy members going through the first round of voting and selecting nominees from among them? That would raise questions in the minds of a lot of folks (including me) -- who were on the nominating committee? What albums did they choose from?
I chose not to write about the process at the time because I didn't think I'd be able to get much information. But NPR last weekend aired a story on an issue I'd heard about before -- how an dance music artist with little popular notoriety snagged a Grammy nod amidst some much larger names. And in that piece, a Grammy official noted that other genres -- including kids music -- used an intermediator, the nominating committee.
When I wrote my piece on the nominations 14 months ago, there was dissatisfaction on my part, but undergirding my words were the feelings of lots of other members who felt that something was amiss with the process. And clearly those feelings translated into a changed nomination process -- if everyone had been totally satisfied, then nothing would have changed. And the result? The Okee Dokee Brothers won -- for an album that also happened to win the 2012 Fids and Kamily Awards. And a couple other albums in the top 15 for F&K, The Pop Ups' Radio Jungle and Elizabeth Mitchell's Little Seed, appeared on the nomination list as well. Previous Grammy winner and longtime kids musician and storyteller Bill Harley joined the group. And while none of those artists approach Taylor Swift-ian sales level, they are, within the genre, popular artists. Can You Canoe? sold about 10,000 albums, and Elizabeth Mitchell consistently ranks amongst the KidzBop-ers and Spongebobs on kids music album charts -- she is a superstar of kindie.
What followed for the Diamondbacks? A decade-plus of middling success. Sure they got back to the playoffs, but they've never made it back to the World Series and have had some poor seasons as well. In part, they've been a victim of their own success, with a not -insubstatial portion of their payroll going to pay deferred salaries from that 2001 squad. Would I trade that 2001 season for more consistent success subsequently? Nah. But it did prove to me that success in these sorts of fields are, if not totally random, at least fleeting.
The question for this site is what follows for kids music. This year's slate of nominees was picked -- in part -- by a small group of people in a secret process. I understand why it's secret, but I am sure some musicians don't like the change. In the end, the final answer will be provided by the Academy members themselves. If a sizable number feel bamboozled by the change, then they will pressure their representatives, and the process could go back to the old way. (This would not be the first time we've switched between methodologies -- the nominating committee was used for awhile in the '90s, too.) If, however, the majority likes this year's results, then the new process will stay. It may mean that bigger stars like Elizabeth Mitchell (for Blue Clouds) and Justin Roberts (for Lullaby and possibly Recess) show up on next year's nominated albums list, and more consistently on future nominee slates. Kids musicians who are members of the Academy will be the final arbiter of whether that's a good thing, not me.
